The exclusion of Ambati Rayudu from India’s 2019 ICC Cricket World Cup squad remains one of the most debated decisions in Indian cricket. This controversial episode unfolded during India's preparations for the marquee event in England. Robin Uthappa has once again brought this topic into the limelight. Scroll down to understand the whole story.
Robin Uthappa's explosive interview reignites debates about Ambati Rayudu's exclusion from the ICC Cricket World Cup 2019 squad, hinting at Virat Kohli’s significant influence over team selection.
Robin Uthappa said that Kohli had significant say over team decisions and alleged that players who didn’t align with the captain’s preferences were often sidelined. Using Rayudu’s omission as an example, Uthappa asserted, 'Anyone disliked by the captain was excluded from the team.'
Rayudu was India’s top contender for the No. 4 batting position, showcasing consistent form in the lead-up to the World Cup, making his omission a surprising move.
Rayudu was in prime form leading to the World Cup. In 2018, he scored 392 runs at an average of 56 in ODIs and was considered India’s No. 4 solution.
The selection committee, led by MSK Prasad, opted for Vijay Shankar, citing his "three-dimensional" abilities (batting, bowling, and fielding) as a key factor over Rayudu.
After missing out, Rayudu tweeted: "Just ordered a new set of 3D glasses to watch the World Cup," mocking the selector’s justification. The tweet went viral.
India’s semi-final loss to New Zealand highlighted middle-order weaknesses, with fans and experts questioning if Rayudu’s absence cost the team a stronger batting lineup.
Rayudu retired temporarily after the snub, expressing heartbreak over missing his World Cup opportunity despite being in peak form and preparation.
Rayudu’s exclusion remains one of Indian cricket’s most debated selection decisions. While his career had notable highs, the 2019 snub left a lasting impact on his legacy. While Kohli remains one of India’s most successful captains, the Rayudu saga underscores the complexities of leadership, raising questions about decision-making dynamics during his tenure.